Posted by: Bruce | July 4, 2012

Street Photography, Sydney 1945

Recently from the WordPress blogs my attention was caught by the post, Spotlight on Street Photography blogs. I have a few old family photos to help organise etc but I remembered one particular photo amongst a lot of gems. A faded stamp on the back of the photo reveals “G. McGrath, p8 Her Majesty’s Arcade, Sydney. Extra copies are available by quoting number”.

Considering the photo was taken around 1945, it is in pretty good nick and a slight fiddle removed a little of the fading towards sepia and put back some black and white.

I can give a few details on this photo because the two snapped walking down one of Sydney’s main streets, maybe George or Pitt, were later to become my Mum and Uncle. Very much a ‘ Back to the Future’ image.

Prior to this post I put the bright lights on Mum and she gave up the following. She doesn’t remember the occasion when it was taken but street photographers were a fairly common breed. A lot of people couldn’t afford cameras of their own and so when approached on the street either agreed to be photographed or not. They were given a card and could order a print if they wanted. She said that this type of photography ran into a bit of trouble and died out maybe 5-10 yrs later. I wonder how this type of photography would, or could, go now?

Whatever the occasion, it is great to look at now. To see the clothing worn, the faces of two girls on the right side of picture watching the shot it seems. Given that my Mum and her brother were from a farm outside Taree and were far from well off, they scrubbed up fairly well I thought. I notice her brother has a tie and/or collar pin, my Mum has gloves. Mum was around 21-22yrs at this time, her brother 3yrs older. I wonder what they were talking about and where they were heading? After all, they were single, they’d left their farm and now lived in the big smoke.

Words for today:   Shoulder pads and collar pins.

Everything old is new again.

More to come; same blog time, same blog channel.

About these ads

Responses

  1. Interesting post! What a great story about how the photo was taken! That’s unusual to hear! I absolutely love looking at old photos and asking the same questions about who? what? where? and why? about the timing the photo was taken. Usually some very interesting stories and facts I never knew before surface from these moments. I suppose that’s why photos are so precious! They are memories and stores captured forever! Thanks for a beautiful written post!

    • Glad you liked it. I admit with this shot I have a personal interest in addition to the image standing alone. A Back to the Future photo of my Mum and Uncle adds that little extra for me. I wonder if some of your photos will do the same one day? With permission of course. Bruce

      • Interestingly I came across this pic and blog whir trying to explore history of a family pic printed by Majestic Photo Service P 10a Her Majesty’s Arcade … had not thought it was taken by a street photographer (as not professional composition of shot) BUT on reflection these candid pics were all the rage. We have some history to uncover around that arcade, your pic is a nice stimulant and reflects maybe multiple studios in same arcade … as your pic cites p8 and ours cites 10a … of course no way of knowing if they were contemporaneous or a decade apart.

      • Given the time frame, end of WW2, perhaps the mood of Australians contributed to a few photography businesses flourishing. As my Mum said, street photography ran into problems and seemed to fade away over 5 years or so. Competition may have been pretty healthy for a while though and, as you say, multiple studios have have existed in the same arcade. I don’t know how a street photographer would go these days; the value of their shots could only increase at time passes but ‘candid’ street shots would have to be arranged. Good luck in your research, it’s interesting stuff. Thanks for your information and taking the time to write.

  2. I do love looking at old photos. they don;t need to be as well composed to be interesting because of the other qualities they bring. it does feel voyeuristic sometimes though looking at someones old family snaps. :)

    • Old photos, as you say, sure have their own qualities. I think street photography composition varies with the subject; sometimes candid shots or nothing; a tough way to make money. I wonder at the gear and film used; no auto-focus or superzooms in 1945, no instant check on exposure.
      I hadn’t thought of the voyeuristic angle. I included family details for authenticity. Maybe you’re lucky I didn’t post a family album. Still, I’m happy for anyone to enjoy the image of this moment in 1945.
      You have some great shots in your portfolio, looks like you should never have put the camera down earlier.
      Thanks for taking the time for your thoughts.

      • Thanks a lot. I’m still very up and down with my camera use. I’m sure I’ll get fully vested soon

  3. Hi Bruce,
    I have several photos of my mother and a mystery man which, after reading your post, I now realise were taken by a street photographer in Sydney during the war. There are several by the Leicograph Company based in The Strand Arcade. The man she is with is not our father, but there is much suspicion that she actually married this man first. When asked who it is she has always claimed she doesn’t remember and yet there are several photos of her with the same man. One has both their first names with the one surname written on it. Bit of a giveaway there. Thanks for adding another, albeit small, piece to the puzzle.

    • Hi and thanks for your interesting comment. I wonder how many ‘couples’ were caught in the lens by street photographers back then, only to appear later before curious eyes followed by awkward questions. It could be one reason why street photographers dropped in popularity, people might have tried to avoid them!
      The same surname does seem a bit of a giveaway but you never know. You might have to get out the bright lights and shine them on your Mum; she might give in then.
      Is it getting chilly in Kobble Creek now?

  4. I have a photo of my parents, dad in uniform and walking with mum when they had just started dating. I also have one of my dad’s two sisters walking together and in the background there are a couple of soldier “checking them out” … I think it was a fantastic idea. I always wondered who actually took the photo and when watching the genealogist TV show “Who Do You Think You Are” Jackie Weaver had a picture of her parents and she mentioned these “wandering photographers”. then a friend gave a link to this blog. And I too have a photo of my mother with a “mystery man” sitting rather cosily (for the time) on a park bench (a WW2 pilot, no less!)

    • They sound like very interesting photos to see Victoria, along with the their stories. Do you have any further information to go with them such as location; perhaps Sydney too? Did your mother have anything to say about the mystery man? Your father?
      I think being a dashing pilot was probably a good thing on the women scene, a bit a chick magnet I reckon.
      It sounds as though you looked at the comment from Kobble Creek and now there are two photos of mothers with a mystery man.
      For balance, a couple of street shots of dads with mystery women is needed!
      Thanks for reading and taking the time to leave your thoughts Victoria. Regards, Bruce.


Want to leave a comment?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers

%d bloggers like this: